AS THE CURRENT PROGENY OR DIRECT DESCENDANT OF PAST RULERS OF ~ ROMAN, BRITISH, FRANCE, GERMANY & ISLAMIC EMPIRES ~ THE SOVEREIGN EMPEROR ~ HIM EMPEROR PROF. DR. MOSHARAF HOSSAIN CHOWDHURY AS THE SOVEREIGN EMPEROR
REPRESENTS HIS MONARCHY GOVT WORLDWIDE WHICH IS KNOWN AS ~
'' FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF COMMONWEALTH'' ALSO KNOWN AS ~ '' ABSOLUTE MONARCHY GOVT OF KING OF KINGS '' WHICH COMPRISES OF MAIN SOVEREIGN EMPIRES OF THE WORLD THAT THE EMPEROR / SOVEREIGN KING REPRESENT BY HIS
HEREDITARY RIGHTS AS THE CURRENT ROYAL BLOODLINE OF PAST EMPERORS / SOVEREIGN KINGS. THE LEGAL JURISDICTION OF THOSE EMPIRES COVERS ALL UN MEMBER STATES AND UNITED NATIONS (UN) NON-MEMBER STATES TOO.
APART FROM HEREDITARY RIGHTS THERE ARE MANY LAWS THAT PROTECTS EMPEROR
AND HIS LEGACY AND HIS SOVEREIGN MONARCHY GOVT AND HIS SOVEREIGN ROYAL ADMINISTRATIONS OR SOVEREIGN ROYAL HOUSES BASED IN DIFFERENT CONTINENTS.
WE WILL SHARE COME COMPILED LAWS FOR THE ATTENTION OF ALL ROYALS, GOVTS AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES APART FROM COURTS WORLDWIDE HERE APART FROM FOR THE ATTENTION OF ALL NATIONS .
*Legal Frameworks Protecting Indigenous and Royal Lineage Rights :
1. Indigenous Rights and International Law ::
- United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP): Adopted by the UN General
Assembly in 2007, this declaration recognizes the rights of indigenous peoples to self-determination, to
maintain and strengthen their institutions, cultures, and traditions.
- International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention 169: This is the only international treaty that
specifically deals with the rights of indigenous and tribal peoples. It provides for the recognition and protection
of indigenous peoples' rights to land, resources, and culture.
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR): Article 27 protects the rights of minorities,
including indigenous peoples, to enjoy their own culture, religion, and language.
- International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR): This covenant, particularly in
Article 15, emphasizes the rights of individuals to participate in cultural life, which could be interpreted to
support indigenous peoples' rights to cultural heritage.
- The Indigenous Peoples' Rights Act (IPRA) of 1997 (Philippines): While this law is specific to the
Philippines, it is an example of national legislation that protects indigenous peoples' rights, including their
ancestral domains, self-governance, and cultural integrity.
2. Royal Bloodline and Heritage Rights ::
- Vienna Convention on Succession of States in Respect of Treaties (1978): While not directly applicable to
individual claims of royal lineage, this convention provides a framework for succession of state obligations,
which could be relevant if your claims involve succession rights.
- Heritage Protection Laws (various national laws): Many countries have specific laws protecting cultural
heritage and royal lineages. For example, the UK has heritage protection for royal families, and France has
laws safeguarding cultural patrimony.
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR): While not specifically about royal lineage, the ECHR
could potentially be invoked to protect rights related to property, heritage, and family life under Article 8 (right
to respect for private and family life) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property).
- Recognition of Nobility and Royal Titles: Different countries have various approaches to recognizing
nobility and royal titles. For example, the UK continues to recognize hereditary peerages, and some countries
in Europe acknowledge certain royal claims.
3. International Legal Instruments on Monarchy and Sovereignty :
- Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933): This treaty sets out the criteria for
statehood, which could be relevant if you are asserting sovereign rights.
- United Nations Charter: Article 2(7) of the UN Charter provides that the UN does not have authority to
intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state, which can include
matters of monarchy and succession.
- Customary International Law: The principles of recognition of state sovereignty and royal lineages are
often guided by customary international law, which includes long-standing practices and norms that are
recognized as binding.
4. National Legal Frameworks :
- United Kingdom: The Royal Marriages Act 1772 (repealed in 2015 but historically significant) and the
Succession to the Crown Act 2013 govern royal succession and marriages.
- France: While France no longer has a monarchy, it has laws governing the protection of cultural heritage,
which might be relevant to claims of royal lineage.
- Germany: Similar to France, Germany no longer has a monarchy, but it has legal frameworks for
protecting cultural heritage, including recognition of historical titles and properties associated with former
royal families.
5. Recognition by International Organizations ::
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO): UNESCO recognizes and
protects cultural heritage, which could extend to royal traditions and lineages.
- International Court of Justice (ICJ): While typically dealing with disputes between states, the ICJ has
occasionally dealt with matters involving sovereignty and succession, which could be indirectly relevant.
*Conclusion :
While there is no single comprehensive legal framework that protects all the rights you have described, there
are various national and international laws that could potentially be relevant. Indigenous rights are
well-established in international law, particularly through instruments like UNDRIP and ILO Convention 169.
However, the protection of royal bloodlines and hereditary rights is more complex, often depending on
national laws and the recognition of states.
For any specific legal actions or claims, consulting with legal experts who specialize in international law,
indigenous rights, and heritage protection would be crucial.
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
*ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE SOVEREIGN EMPEROR (KING OF KINGS) :
The idea of claiming sovereignty or legal rights over modern nations and territories based on descent from historical empires is a complex matter that intersects with various fields of law, including national, regional, international, and heritage laws. Below is a breakdown of how such claims might be approached legally, considering the frameworks included above .
1. National Laws ::
Modern Constitutional Law: Most nations today are governed by constitutions that define the powers of the state, the rights of citizens, and the rules of succession where applicable (e.g., monarchies like the United Kingdom). These constitutions do not recognize hereditary claims to rule from historical empires unless explicitly codified within their legal systems.
Monarchies: In countries like the United Kingdom, where there is still a monarchy, the line of succession is defined by specific laws (e.g., the Act of Settlement 1701, the Royal Marriages Act 1772). Claims to the throne or royal rights are recognized only if they fit within the framework of these established laws.
2. Regional and Continental Laws ::
European Union Law: EU law primarily deals with the rights of member states and citizens within the EU. It does not provide for recognition of claims based on historical empires. The EU operates under principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity of its member states.
Council of Europe: The Council of Europe, through the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), protects individual rights within its member states but does not address claims to rule or sovereignty based on historical lineage.
3. Empire and Historical Laws ::
Roman Law: Roman law is a historical legal system that influenced the development of modern legal systems, particularly in civil law countries. However, it does not provide a legal basis for claims of sovereignty in the present day.
British Imperial Law: The British Empire's laws ceased to apply in most regions following decolonization and the establishment of independent nation-states. Modern Commonwealth countries have their own legal systems, and British imperial law has no current legal standing.
4. International Law ::
Sovereignty and Recognition: International law recognizes the sovereignty of states as defined by their current borders and governance structures. The United Nations and other international bodies do not recognize claims to rule based on historical empires unless such claims are recognized by the current state in question.
Indigenous Peoples' Rights: The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples recognizes the rights of indigenous peoples to maintain their cultures and governance systems. However, this does not extend to hereditary claims over modern nation-states unless recognized within the state's legal framework.
Hereditary Rights and Royal Titles: International law respects the cultural significance of royal families, but this does not confer political or legal power unless recognized by the state.
5. International Court of Justice (ICJ) and Other International Judgments ::
The ICJ and similar bodies adjudicate disputes between states based on international law. They do not address claims of individual sovereignty or hereditary rule unless they involve recognized states or governments.
6. Common Law ::
Precedent: In common law systems, legal decisions are based on precedents. Any claim of sovereignty or royal rights would need to be supported by existing legal precedents within the relevant jurisdiction.
Property and Inheritance Law: Common law systems recognize property and inheritance rights, but these typically apply within the context of current legal systems and do not extend to claims of national sovereignty.
7. Heritage Laws ::
Cultural Heritage: International conventions like the UNESCO World Heritage Convention recognize and protect cultural heritage, including sites and artifacts. This recognition, however, does not extend to legal claims of sovereignty or rule.
Royal Heritage: Some countries have laws that protect the heritage and titles of royal families, but these do not typically confer political authority or legal jurisdiction over territories.
8. Hereditary Rights Laws ::
Titles and Succession: Laws concerning hereditary titles and succession vary by country. In some countries, these laws are enshrined in the constitution or specific legal codes (e.g., Spain, the UK). These laws govern the inheritance of titles, not political power over territories.
9. UN Conventions and Laws ::
UN Charter: The UN Charter upholds the sovereignty and territorial integrity of member states, making no provision for claims of rule based on historical empires.
UNESCO: Protects cultural heritage but does not provide a basis for claims of sovereignty or rule.
10. Rights Over Ireland ::
Historical Claims: While emperors ancestor have ruled over France, the UK, and Ireland, the modern Republic of Ireland is a sovereign state with its own legal system. Any claims would need to be recognized by the Irish legal system.
Irish Legal Systems already aware of the Sovereign Emperors Family History.
Also Sovereign Emperor is recognized by other sovereign royal houses and holds numerous nobility titles from other sovereign royal houses those are as bellows and registered within British peerage systems and international courts and numerous supreme courts worldwide apart from UN and UN Agencies and many regulatory bodies worldwide :
1) King of Isle of Anglesey, Wales, Uk ;
2) King of Tuscany, Italy, EU ;
3) Sovereign Emperor / King of Kingdom of Ireland (Republic of Ireland + Northern Ireland) .
Good Friday Agreement: This agreement, central to modern Irish and UK law, recognizes the sovereignty of the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland’s right to self-determination . And Good Friday Agreement guarantees peace process between UK and Irish Governments. However under autocracy Monarchy remains sovereign and is responsible for overall supervision for peace process internationally and also backed by Union of Crowns and also
operating main empires and through supervision restoring peace globally.
More Info About Union of Crowns :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_of_the_Crowns ;
More Info About Good Friday Agreement :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Friday_Agreement ;
*Conclusion :
In modern legal contexts, claims to rule or sovereignty based on historical empires or hereditary rights are not recognized unless they align with current national, regional, and international laws. Sovereignty is a legal and political concept defined by current legal frameworks, not historical lineage. Because the Sovereign Emperor have a legitimate claim, it would be important to work within these existing legal frameworks and possibly consult with experts in international law, constitutional law, and heritage law. The above breakdown provides a broad overview. For specific legal advice, emperor should consult with a legal expert who specializes in royal claims, international law, or the legal systems of the countries in question while implementing tasks or actions.
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
*OTHER SPECIAL LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE SOVEREIGN EMPEROR SPECIALLY OVER ISLAMIC EMPIRE / MOSTLY ARAB NATIONS / ISLAMIC COUNTRIES / COUNTRIES WITH MUSLIM MAJORITIES :
The concept of a hereditary claim to rule, particularly in relation to the Islamic Empire and modern Islamic countries, is complex and does not align neatly with current legal frameworks at national, regional, or international levels. Here’s a breakdown of the key points related to some facts and laws in modern time :
1. Modern National Laws ::
Saudi Arabia: The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is a monarchy, currently ruled by the Al Saud family. Saudi law recognizes the hereditary nature of its monarchy within the Al Saud family. Any claim to rule would need to be recognized within the framework of the Saudi royal family’s established succession laws. Claims based on descent from the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) alone do not establish legal rights within this framework unless recognize by the legal systems.
Other Arab and Islamic Countries: Many other countries in the Arab world are republics or constitutional monarchies with their own legal frameworks for governance. These countries do not recognize hereditary claims based on descent from historical rulers or the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) as conferring any legal rights unless all valid claims exist within the legal systems .
2. Regional and Islamic Law ::
Sharia (Islamic Law): Sharia law, while respected and practiced across Islamic countries, does not establish a legal framework for modern governance based on hereditary claims to rule. Leadership in Islam traditionally emphasized merit, consultation, and the consent of the governed (e.g., the concept of "Shura"). Any claims to leadership or rule would generally be subject to contemporary interpretations and applications of Sharia within each country.
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC): The GCC includes several monarchies (like Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Kuwait), but each has its own legal framework for succession and governance. The GCC does not provide any regional legal recognition of hereditary claims from non-ruling families. However legal
records existing within the legal systems very important for recognition.
3. International Law ::
Recognition of Sovereignty: International law recognizes the sovereignty of states as defined by their borders and governance structures. The United Nations and other international bodies do not recognize hereditary claims to rule that are not supported by the legal and political framework of the country in question.
Indigenous Rights: While international law (e.g., the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples) recognizes the rights of indigenous peoples to maintain their culture, identity, and governance systems, this does not extend to hereditary claims over modern nation-states unless recognized within the state's legal framework.
Royal Titles and Heritage: Some international conventions and treaties recognize the cultural and historical significance of royal families, but these do not confer political or legal power unless recognized by the state in question.
4. Hereditary Rights and Historical Claims ::
Historical Precedence: The historical rule of Islamic empires, such as the Abbasid and Ottoman Caliphates, is not directly applicable to modern nation-states. While these empires played significant roles in Islamic history, the modern states that emerged after their dissolution (e.g., post-Ottoman Empire) do not recognize hereditary claims to rule based on these empires. However
Islamic Empire represented by current progeny of Holy Prophet Hazrat Muhammad SAW has to be known by the legal systems in Islamic Countries.
Cultural and Religious Significance: Descendants of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW), often referred to as Sayyids or Sharifs, are respected in many Islamic cultures. However, this respect is typically social and religious rather than political or legal. However the sovereign emperor (King of Kings ) also represents Hossain Dynasty of Imam Hossain (Son of Caliph Ali RA and Grandson of Prophet Muhammad SAW PBUH) that was later on changed to Hossain Shahi Dynasty ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hussain_Shahi_dynasty ) by another ancestor of the sovereign emperor (King of Kings) while one of his ancestor became ruler of Bengal Sultanate before or during his ruling period (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bengal_Sultanate) .
Bengal Sultanate included modern-day Bangladesh, the Indian state of West Bengal, and the Myanmarese state of Rakhine. On the Indian subcontinent's Bay of Bengal coast, the Bengal Sultanate was a sovereign medieval Islamic state. It was founded in 1342.
5. Path Forward ::
The sovereign emperor have a legitimate claim based on heritage, the appropriate course of action would be to seek recognition through legal, diplomatic, and political channels within the relevant country or countries. This would likely involve significant negotiations and the support of influential political entities within those countries.
In current time almost all governments and important international bodies have all important legal records and family history of the sovereign emperor and sovereign emperor is a recognized sovereign therefore by almost all important royal houses worldwide as they recognize his bloodline and hereditary rights.
Therefore apart from Emperor's hereditary rights other nobility titles were granted to the sovereign emperor by other important royal houses to empower his global affairs to keep peace process worldwide and to carry out royal duties.
6. Conclusion ::
In the current global legal framework, any claims to rule based on hereditary rights, particularly those related to the Islamic Empire or historical Arab monarchies, are not fully recognized unless they align with the established legal frameworks of the relevant nation-states. Respect for cultural and historical lineage is significant, but legal and political rights are determined by the contemporary legal structures and governance systems in place today.
The Sovereign Emperor has sought to assert such claims. It would be important to work within these existing frameworks and perhaps consult with legal experts in international and constitutional law who specialize in royal claims and hereditary rights from time to time in order to make sure all legal affairs of the sovereign emperor are more aligned with national and international laws, legislation, rules, bills & acts and all government policies apart from all private, public and supranational international laws.
Public International Law: Governs relations between international institutions and states. Covers areas like the environment, ocean, international business, and human rights.
Private International Law (Conflict of Laws): Deals with legal disputes involving private parties across different countries.
Supranational Law: Applies to organizations or entities that transcend national boundaries.
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
*UNDERSTAND AND GAIN KNOWLEDGE ABOUT COLONIAL EMPIRE OF THE
SOVEREIGN EMPEROR (KING OF KINGS) AND HIS ROYAL FAMILY :
*LEGAL FRAMEWORKS THAT LEGALLY PROTECTS LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE SOVEREIGN EMPEROR AND HIS ROYAL FAMILY AS THE PROGENY OF PAST EMPERORS OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE, BRITISH EMPIRE, FRENCH EMPIRE, GERMAN EMPIRE AND ISLAMIC EMPIRE WITHIN ITS ALL COLONIES AND COLONIAL EMPIRES WORLDWIDE :
To address your request, we'll begin by summarizing the types of laws that have historically protected the rights of sovereigns and emperors within the colonies of the Roman, British, French, German, and Islamic Empires. These legal frameworks typically include the following categories:
Sovereign Immunity and Rights :
Roman Empire: Laws protecting the divine status of the Emperor and immunity from prosecution.
British Empire: Common Law principles such as Sovereign Immunity, wherein the monarch cannot be sued or prosecuted.
French Empire: Napoleonic Code and other legal principles granting the Emperor special rights and immunities.
German Empire: Legal provisions in the Imperial Constitution protecting the Kaiser and his authority.
Islamic Empire: Sharia laws that provide certain protections and rights to the Caliph or Sultan, viewed as the leader of the Ummah (Islamic community).
Colonial Governance and Authority :
Roman Empire: Provincial laws that granted the Emperor control over the military, governance, and judicial matters within the colonies.
British Empire: Royal Prerogatives that allowed the Crown to rule over colonies, appoint governors, and implement colonial laws.
French Empire: Codes and decrees that allowed the Emperor to govern colonies and appoint colonial administrators.
German Empire: Schutzgebiet (protectorate) laws that placed colonies directly under the Kaiser’s authority.
Islamic Empire: Fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence) principles that allowed the Caliph to exercise authority over distant lands and delegate governance to local leaders.
Inheritance and Succession Laws :
Roman Empire: Laws governing the succession of the Emperor, often influenced by adoption or inheritance within the Julio-Claudian line.
British Empire: Primogeniture laws ensuring the succession of the Crown through the royal family.
French Empire: Salic Law, which determined the succession rights within the ruling family.
German Empire: Legal frameworks that dictated succession based on royal family lineage.
Islamic Empire: Islamic inheritance laws that could apply to the leadership succession, often considering the most capable male relative.
Cultural and Religious Protections :
Roman Empire: Laws protecting the Emperor's role as Pontifex Maximus, overseeing religious practices.
British Empire: The monarch’s role as Supreme Governor of the Church of England, safeguarding religious authority.
French Empire: Concordats and agreements with the Catholic Church reinforcing the Emperor’s role in religious matters.
German Empire: Protection of the Kaiser’s position as the head of state religion.
Islamic Empire: Laws ensuring the Caliph’s or Sultan’s role as protector of Islam and its practices within the empire.
International Law and Diplomatic Protections :
Roman Empire: Jus gentium (law of nations), which extended the Emperor's authority in dealings with foreign entities and territories.
British Empire: International treaties and diplomatic immunity laws that protected the Crown’s interests globally.
French Empire: Diplomatic laws and treaties that secured the Emperor’s rights in international affairs.
German Empire: Legal structures ensuring the Kaiser’s authority in international relations and colonial expansion.
Islamic Empire: Siyar (Islamic international law) guiding the Caliph’s diplomatic and military engagements with non-Muslim states.
Comments